LEDTranslatedA clearer view of light.

Red light research, in plain English.

Fifteen studies from PubMed on red, near-infrared and blue LED light for skin, each explained without the jargon: what was done, what was found and what it cannot tell you. Each page links to the masks that list the same wavelengths.

Summaries of published abstracts · Newest first · Not medical advice

  1. Randomised, sham-controlled, double-blind trial · 2025How often should you use a red LED mask? A sham-controlled trialTwo sessions a week against three, compared with a sham mask
  2. Randomised split-face trial · 2023Red vs amber light for eye wrinkles, at the same dose660 nm on one side of the face, 590 nm on the other
  3. Prospective controlled study · 2020A home-use 660/850 nm LED mask alongside hyaluronic acidDoes adding a mask to a serum routine change the result?
  4. Randomised animal study · 2020Red vs near-infrared light on healing skin grafts, in rats630 nm and 850 nm light on skin repair
  5. Systematic review of randomised controlled trials · 2018LEDs in dermatology: what 31 randomised trials add up toA systematic review that grades the evidence by condition
  6. Narrative review · 2017Why red light may calm inflammation: the mechanism reviewCytochrome c oxidase, ATP and the biphasic dose response
  7. Narrative review · 2015830 nm light after cosmetic procedures: what the review foundNear-infrared light to reduce redness, swelling and downtime
  8. Randomised controlled trial · 2014Red light and collagen density: a 136-person controlled trialRed-only light against a broad red-to-infrared spectrum
  9. Narrative review · 2013Low-level light therapy for skin: an overview from Harvard researchersHow red and near-infrared light act on skin cells
  10. Laboratory study plus single-blinded split-face study · 2009Pulsed 660 nm light, collagen production and wrinkle depthFrom lab-grown skin to a split-face study
  11. Pilot study, uncontrolled · 2009Blue plus near-infrared light for acne: a pilot with mixed results415 nm and 830 nm light, compared with earlier blue-plus-red results
  12. Randomised, sham-controlled, double-blind trial · 2007Red and near-infrared LEDs on wrinkles: a sham-controlled split-face trial633 nm and 830 nm LEDs, alone and together, against a sham light
  13. Uncontrolled clinical study · 2006Alternating 415 nm blue and 633 nm red LED sessions for acneEight sessions over four weeks, with 12 weeks of follow-up
  14. Uncontrolled clinical study · 2005Combined 633 nm and 830 nm light for wrinkles around the eyesNine clinic sessions of red plus near-infrared light
  15. Randomised, observer-blinded trial · 2000Blue plus red light for acne, compared with benzoyl peroxide415 nm and 660 nm light against white light and a standard cream

Studies were chosen to cover the wavelengths found on the masks in the comparison, including trials with small or null results. Many used clinic devices at doses that home masks may not deliver. A wavelength match does not mean a mask reproduces a study’s results.