² LED Mask Specs reports 160+ multi-zone LEDs. Count, wavelengths and EU reference price have not been independently validated here. Programme duration varies; consult the FW312 manual.
LED Mask Specs baseline; manufacturer page consulted.
Shark CryoGlow vs Silk’n Face Mask 100
Shark CryoGlow FW312 and Silk’n LED Face Mask 100, side by side. They share no listed wavelengths; Shark CryoGlow lists 160+ LEDs and Silk’n Face Mask 100 lists 100. Published specifications only; neither is ranked.
Key differences
- Shared wavelengths
- None listed in common
- Only Shark CryoGlow
- 415, 630, 830 nm
- Only Silk’n Face Mask 100
- 463, 592, 633 nm
- LED count
- 160+ vs 100
- Session
- Programme-dependent; 8 min in baseline vs 10 min; page also lists 15 min
- Near-infrared
- Only Shark CryoGlow lists near-infrared
What the differences mean
Near-infrared is the clearest difference: only the Shark CryoGlow lists it. Near-infrared (around 830–850 nm) appears in wrinkle and recovery studies, usually paired with red.
Both list blue light, which acne studies paired with red.
Sessions differ: Programme-dependent; 8 min in baseline versus 10 min; page also lists 15 min. Session time alone does not set the dose; output matters too.
Studies matching only the Shark CryoGlow
- LEDs in dermatology: what 31 randomised trials add up toSystematic review of randomised controlled trials · 2018
- Why red light may calm inflammation: the mechanism reviewNarrative review · 2017
- 830 nm light after cosmetic procedures: what the review foundNarrative review · 2015
- Low-level light therapy for skin: an overview from Harvard researchersNarrative review · 2013
- Blue plus near-infrared light for acne: a pilot with mixed resultsPilot study, uncontrolled · 2009
- Red and near-infrared LEDs on wrinkles: a sham-controlled split-face trialRandomised, sham-controlled, double-blind trial · 2007
- Alternating 415 nm blue and 633 nm red LED sessions for acneUncontrolled clinical study · 2006
- Combined 633 nm and 830 nm light for wrinkles around the eyesUncontrolled clinical study · 2005
- Blue plus red light for acne, compared with benzoyl peroxideRandomised, observer-blinded trial · 2000
One studies match both, including red light and collagen density: a 136-person controlled trial.
| Specification |  SharkCryoGlow FW312 |  Silk’nLED Face Mask 100 |
|---|---|---|
| Wavelengths | 415 · 630 · 830 nm | 463 · 592 · 633 nm |
| LED count | 160+² | 100 |
| Reported irradiance | Not found on checked page | 13.23–89.68 mW/cm² |
| Session | Programme-dependent; 8 min in baseline | 10 min; page also lists 15 min |
| Fit | Rigid shell · under-eye cooling | Semi-rigid, baseline description |
| Power & controls | Rechargeable; check regional manual | Rechargeable controller |
| Regulatory claim | FDA cleared · CE/UKCA, as reported by LED Mask Specs | CE cosmetic-device claim in baseline; FDA status not verified |
| Reference price | US$349.99Manufacturer US page, 31 Oct 2026; LED Mask Specs EU reference €379.99 | €160Manufacturer EU page, 31 Oct 2026 |
| Data origin | LED Mask Specs baseline; manufacturer page consulted | Manufacturer wavelengths, output, LED count and price; baseline remaining fields |
4006008001100 nm
Shark CryoGlow
415 nanometres630 nanometres830 nanometres
Silk’n Face Mask 100
463 nanometres592 nanometres633 nanometres
BlueGreenYellowRedNear-infrared
LED count and output are not measures of effectiveness. Output figures use different, often unspecified measurement conditions. Prices keep their original currency and are not current offers.
Questions
Which has more wavelengths, the Shark CryoGlow or the Silk’n Face Mask 100?
Both list 3: 415 · 630 · 830 nm and 463 · 592 · 633 nm.
Do the Shark CryoGlow and Silk’n Face Mask 100 share any wavelengths?
No exact wavelengths in common, although some may sit in the same colour band.
Which research matches each mask?
1 of the 15 summarised studies match both. 9 match only the Shark CryoGlow and 0 match only the Silk’n Face Mask 100.
Manufacturer lists red 25.04, blue 89.68, yellow 13.23 and purple 77.95 mW/cm². Purple blends red and blue. This corrects the baseline’s missing-output label. Measurement conditions are not harmonised across brands.
Manufacturer wavelengths, output, LED count and price; baseline remaining fields.