Manufacturer help centre specifies approximately 30 mW/cm² for Contour Face. The remaining baseline fields and reference price come from LED Mask Specs.
Manufacturer irradiance, price and FDA claim; LED Mask Specs baseline.
Omnilux Contour vs Silk’n Face Mask 100
Omnilux Contour Face and Silk’n LED Face Mask 100, side by side. They share 633 nm; Omnilux Contour lists 132 LEDs and Silk’n Face Mask 100 lists 100. Published specifications only; neither is ranked.
Key differences
- Shared wavelengths
- 633 nm
- Only Omnilux Contour
- 830 nm
- Only Silk’n Face Mask 100
- 463, 592 nm
- LED count
- 132 vs 100
- Session
- 10 min vs 10 min; page also lists 15 min
- Near-infrared
- Only Omnilux Contour lists near-infrared
What the differences mean
Near-infrared is the clearest difference: only the Omnilux Contour lists it. Near-infrared (around 830–850 nm) appears in wrinkle and recovery studies, usually paired with red.
Only the Silk’n Face Mask 100 lists blue light, which acne studies paired with red.
Both list 10 min sessions.
Studies matching only the Omnilux Contour
- Why red light may calm inflammation: the mechanism reviewNarrative review · 2017
- 830 nm light after cosmetic procedures: what the review foundNarrative review · 2015
- Low-level light therapy for skin: an overview from Harvard researchersNarrative review · 2013
- Red and near-infrared LEDs on wrinkles: a sham-controlled split-face trialRandomised, sham-controlled, double-blind trial · 2007
- Combined 633 nm and 830 nm light for wrinkles around the eyesUncontrolled clinical study · 2005
One studies match both, including red light and collagen density: a 136-person controlled trial.
| Specification |  OmniluxContour Face |  Silk’nLED Face Mask 100 |
|---|---|---|
| Wavelengths | 633 · 830 nm | 463 · 592 · 633 nm |
| LED count | 132 | 100 |
| Reported irradiance | ≈30 mW/cm² | 13.23–89.68 mW/cm² |
| Session | 10 min | 10 min; page also lists 15 min |
| Fit | Flexible silicone | Semi-rigid, baseline description |
| Power & controls | Rechargeable controller | Rechargeable controller |
| Regulatory claim | FDA cleared for full-face wrinkles, manufacturer claim; CE · TGA as reported by LED Mask Specs | CE cosmetic-device claim in baseline; FDA status not verified |
| Reference price | €453.75Manufacturer EU page, 31 Oct 2026 | €160Manufacturer EU page, 31 Oct 2026 |
| Data origin | Manufacturer irradiance, price and FDA claim; LED Mask Specs baseline | Manufacturer wavelengths, output, LED count and price; baseline remaining fields |
4006008001100 nm
Omnilux Contour
633 nanometres830 nanometres
Silk’n Face Mask 100
463 nanometres592 nanometres633 nanometres
BlueGreenYellowRedNear-infrared
LED count and output are not measures of effectiveness. Output figures use different, often unspecified measurement conditions. Prices keep their original currency and are not current offers.
Questions
Which has more wavelengths, the Omnilux Contour or the Silk’n Face Mask 100?
The Silk’n Face Mask 100 lists 3 wavelengths and the Omnilux Contour lists 2. More wavelengths is not the same as more effective.
Do the Omnilux Contour and Silk’n Face Mask 100 share any wavelengths?
Yes: 633 nm.
Which research matches each mask?
1 of the 15 summarised studies match both. 5 match only the Omnilux Contour and 0 match only the Silk’n Face Mask 100.
Manufacturer lists red 25.04, blue 89.68, yellow 13.23 and purple 77.95 mW/cm². Purple blends red and blue. This corrects the baseline’s missing-output label. Measurement conditions are not harmonised across brands.
Manufacturer wavelengths, output, LED count and price; baseline remaining fields.