Manufacturer help centre specifies approximately 30 mW/cm² for Contour Face. The remaining baseline fields and reference price come from LED Mask Specs.
Manufacturer irradiance, price and FDA claim; LED Mask Specs baseline.
Omnilux Contour vs Therabody Mask Glo
Omnilux Contour Face and Therabody TheraFace Mask Glo, side by side. They share 633, 830 nm; Omnilux Contour lists 132 LEDs and Therabody Mask Glo lists 504. Published specifications only; neither is ranked.
Key differences
- Shared wavelengths
- 633, 830 nm
- Only Omnilux Contour
- No unique wavelengths
- Only Therabody Mask Glo
- 415 nm
- LED count
- 132 vs 504
- Session
- 10 min vs 12 min full routine
- Near-infrared
- Both list near-infrared
What the differences mean
Both list red and near-infrared light, the pairing used in several wrinkle studies.
Only the Therabody Mask Glo lists blue light, which acne studies paired with red.
Sessions differ: 10 min versus 12 min full routine. Session time alone does not set the dose; output matters too.
Studies matching only the Therabody Mask Glo
- LEDs in dermatology: what 31 randomised trials add up toSystematic review of randomised controlled trials · 2018
- Blue plus near-infrared light for acne: a pilot with mixed resultsPilot study, uncontrolled · 2009
- Alternating 415 nm blue and 633 nm red LED sessions for acneUncontrolled clinical study · 2006
- Blue plus red light for acne, compared with benzoyl peroxideRandomised, observer-blinded trial · 2000
Six studies match both, including why red light may calm inflammation: the mechanism review.
| Specification |  OmniluxContour Face |  TherabodyTheraFace Mask Glo |
|---|---|---|
| Wavelengths | 633 · 830 nm | 415 · 633 · 830 nm |
| LED count | 132 | 504 |
| Reported irradiance | ≈30 mW/cm² | Not found on checked page |
| Session | 10 min | 12 min full routine |
| Fit | Flexible silicone | Rigid polymer housing · 514 g |
| Power & controls | Rechargeable controller | Cordless rechargeable · scalp vibration |
| Regulatory claim | FDA cleared for full-face wrinkles, manufacturer claim; CE · TGA as reported by LED Mask Specs | FDA cleared · CE, as reported by LED Mask Specs |
| Reference price | €453.75Manufacturer EU page, 31 Oct 2026 | €349Manufacturer EU page, 31 Oct 2026 |
| Data origin | Manufacturer irradiance, price and FDA claim; LED Mask Specs baseline | Manufacturer specifications; baseline price/regulatory claim |
4006008001100 nm
Omnilux Contour
633 nanometres830 nanometres
Therabody Mask Glo
415 nanometres633 nanometres830 nanometres
BlueGreenYellowRedNear-infrared
LED count and output are not measures of effectiveness. Output figures use different, often unspecified measurement conditions. Prices keep their original currency and are not current offers.
Questions
Which has more wavelengths, the Omnilux Contour or the Therabody Mask Glo?
The Therabody Mask Glo lists 3 wavelengths and the Omnilux Contour lists 2. More wavelengths is not the same as more effective.
Do the Omnilux Contour and Therabody Mask Glo share any wavelengths?
Yes: 633, 830 nm.
Which research matches each mask?
6 of the 15 summarised studies match both. 0 match only the Omnilux Contour and 4 match only the Therabody Mask Glo.
Manufacturer confirms 504 LEDs, 415/633/830 nm and a 12-minute routine. Individual treatments run 4–12 minutes. Materials are PC/ABS and TPU; the original source’s semi-rigid description is replaced.
Manufacturer specifications; baseline price/regulatory claim.