Manufacturer help centre specifies approximately 30 mW/cm² for Contour Face. The remaining baseline fields and reference price come from LED Mask Specs.
Manufacturer irradiance, price and FDA claim; LED Mask Specs baseline.
Omnilux Contour vs Shark CryoGlow
Omnilux Contour Face and Shark CryoGlow FW312, side by side. They share 830 nm; Omnilux Contour lists 132 LEDs and Shark CryoGlow lists 160+. Published specifications only; neither is ranked.
Key differences
- Shared wavelengths
- 830 nm
- Only Omnilux Contour
- 633 nm
- Only Shark CryoGlow
- 415, 630 nm
- LED count
- 132 vs 160+
- Session
- 10 min vs Programme-dependent; 8 min in baseline
- Near-infrared
- Both list near-infrared
What the differences mean
Both list red and near-infrared light, the pairing used in several wrinkle studies.
Only the Shark CryoGlow lists blue light, which acne studies paired with red.
Sessions differ: 10 min versus Programme-dependent; 8 min in baseline. Session time alone does not set the dose; output matters too.
Studies matching only the Shark CryoGlow
- LEDs in dermatology: what 31 randomised trials add up toSystematic review of randomised controlled trials · 2018
- Blue plus near-infrared light for acne: a pilot with mixed resultsPilot study, uncontrolled · 2009
- Alternating 415 nm blue and 633 nm red LED sessions for acneUncontrolled clinical study · 2006
- Blue plus red light for acne, compared with benzoyl peroxideRandomised, observer-blinded trial · 2000
Six studies match both, including why red light may calm inflammation: the mechanism review.
| Specification |  OmniluxContour Face |  SharkCryoGlow FW312 |
|---|---|---|
| Wavelengths | 633 · 830 nm | 415 · 630 · 830 nm |
| LED count | 132 | 160+² |
| Reported irradiance | ≈30 mW/cm² | Not found on checked page |
| Session | 10 min | Programme-dependent; 8 min in baseline |
| Fit | Flexible silicone | Rigid shell · under-eye cooling |
| Power & controls | Rechargeable controller | Rechargeable; check regional manual |
| Regulatory claim | FDA cleared for full-face wrinkles, manufacturer claim; CE · TGA as reported by LED Mask Specs | FDA cleared · CE/UKCA, as reported by LED Mask Specs |
| Reference price | €453.75Manufacturer EU page, 31 Oct 2026 | US$349.99Manufacturer US page, 31 Oct 2026; LED Mask Specs EU reference €379.99 |
| Data origin | Manufacturer irradiance, price and FDA claim; LED Mask Specs baseline | LED Mask Specs baseline; manufacturer page consulted |
4006008001100 nm
Omnilux Contour
633 nanometres830 nanometres
Shark CryoGlow
415 nanometres630 nanometres830 nanometres
BlueGreenYellowRedNear-infrared
LED count and output are not measures of effectiveness. Output figures use different, often unspecified measurement conditions. Prices keep their original currency and are not current offers.
Questions
Which has more wavelengths, the Omnilux Contour or the Shark CryoGlow?
The Shark CryoGlow lists 3 wavelengths and the Omnilux Contour lists 2. More wavelengths is not the same as more effective.
Do the Omnilux Contour and Shark CryoGlow share any wavelengths?
Yes: 830 nm.
Which research matches each mask?
6 of the 15 summarised studies match both. 0 match only the Omnilux Contour and 4 match only the Shark CryoGlow.
² LED Mask Specs reports 160+ multi-zone LEDs. Count, wavelengths and EU reference price have not been independently validated here. Programme duration varies; consult the FW312 manual.
LED Mask Specs baseline; manufacturer page consulted.